Athlon II X3 450 vs Xeon X5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5450
2007
120 Watt
1.51
+29.1%
Athlon II X3 450
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.17

Xeon X5450 outperforms Athlon II X3 450 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21482374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.89
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.191.17
Architecture codenameno dataRana (2009−2011)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data3 (Tri-Core)
Threadsno data3
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data169 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771AM3
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5450 1.51
+29.1%
Athlon II X3 450 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5450 2406
+29.5%
Athlon II X3 450 1858

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5450 382
+25.7%
Athlon II X3 450 304

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5450 1105
+47.5%
Athlon II X3 450 749

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 1.17
Recency 1 October 2007 21 September 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon X5450 has a 29.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II X3 450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X3 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X3 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5450 and Athlon II X3 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450
AMD Athlon II X3 450
Athlon II X3 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 321 vote

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 289 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5450 or Athlon II X3 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.