A8-5500 vs Xeon X5450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5450
2007
120 Watt
1.50
A8-5500
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.63
+8.7%

A8-5500 outperforms Xeon X5450 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5450 and A8-5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21952131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.192.39
Architecture codenameno dataTrinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5450 and A8-5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5450 and A8-5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FM2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and A8-5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5450 and A8-5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and A8-5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5450 and A8-5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7560D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5450 1.50
A8-5500 1.63
+8.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5450 2406
A8-5500 2610
+8.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5450 384
+0.8%
A8-5500 381

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5450 1109
+21.7%
A8-5500 911

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 1.63
Recency 1 October 2007 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

A8-5500 has a 8.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5450 and A8-5500.

Be aware that Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation processor while A8-5500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450
AMD A8-5500
A8-5500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 328 votes

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 341 vote

Rate A8-5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5450 and A8-5500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.