Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Xeon X5365

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5365
2007
150 Watt
1.51

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20342031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.412.80
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codenameno dataYorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date1 July 2007 (16 years ago)no data
Current price$79 $54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 583% better value for money than Xeon X5365.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.83 GHz
Bus supportno data1333 MHz
L2 cacheno data12288 KB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPLGA771LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1,DDR2,DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5365 1.51
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5365 2331
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2340
+0.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5365 389
+5.7%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 368

Xeon X5365 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X5365 1129
+7.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1046

Xeon X5365 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 8% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 95 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

Be aware that Xeon X5365 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5365 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5365
Xeon X5365
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 21 vote

Rate Xeon X5365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1811 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5365 or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.