Xeon X3460 vs X3480

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
+10.2%
Xeon X3460
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.87

Xeon X3480 outperforms Xeon X3460 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19061993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.270.42
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.051.86
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612$316

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X3460 has 56% better value for money than Xeon X3480.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3.46 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size296 mm2296 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °C73 °C
Number of transistors774 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3480 2.06
+10.2%
Xeon X3460 1.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3480 3273
+10.1%
Xeon X3460 2972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 1.87
Recency 30 May 2010 8 September 2009

Xeon X3480 has a 10.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Xeon X3480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3460 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3480 and Xeon X3460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480
Intel Xeon X3460
Xeon X3460

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 144 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 103 votes

Rate Xeon X3460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3480 or Xeon X3460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.