Xeon 6714P vs X3480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2197not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.85no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date30 May 2010 (15 years ago)24 February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612$2,816

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.06 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °C65 °C
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1688

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X3480 3335
Samples: 72
Xeon 6714P 37702
+1030%
Samples: 2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2010 24 February 2025
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon X3480 has 74% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6714P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon X3480 and Intel Xeon 6714P. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 172 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6714P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X3480 and Xeon 6714P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.