Xeon X5355 vs X3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.12
+65.6%

Xeon X3470 outperforms Xeon X5355 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18662269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataClovertown (2006−2007)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)14 November 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.67 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data4 MB (per die)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistorsno data582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.12
+65.6%
Xeon X5355 1.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3470 3268
+65.1%
Xeon X5355 1979

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 1.28
Recency 1 July 2009 14 November 2006
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon X3470 has a 65.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
Intel Xeon X5355
Xeon X5355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 729 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X5355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or Xeon X5355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.