Xeon E-2378 vs X3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.11
Xeon E-2378
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
11.23
+432%

E-2378 outperforms X3470 by a whopping 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1776630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7333.88
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataRocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)8 September 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$130 $469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2378 has 4541% better value for money than Xeon X3470.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.11
Xeon E-2378 11.23
+432%

E-2378 outperforms X3470 by 432% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3470 3260
Xeon E-2378 17364
+433%

E-2378 outperforms X3470 by 433% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 11.23
Recency 1 July 2009 8 September 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E-2378 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3470 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Xeon E-2378, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
Intel Xeon E-2378
Xeon E-2378

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 712 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon E-2378 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or Xeon E-2378, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.