Celeron J4125 vs Xeon X3470

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
+10.8%
Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86

Xeon X3470 outperforms Celeron J4125 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19061998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.285.56
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.0517.60
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4125 has 1886% better value for money than Xeon X3470.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.06
+10.8%
Celeron J4125 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3470 3269
+10.6%
Celeron J4125 2957

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 1.86
Recency 8 September 2009 4 November 2019
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X3470 has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4125, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4125 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Celeron J4125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 744 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1529 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or Celeron J4125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.