Pentium Extreme Edition 965 vs Xeon X3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3450
2009, $241
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.63
+191%
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
2006, $999
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
0.56

Xeon X3450 outperforms Pentium Extreme Edition 965 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22843076
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.840.46
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Presler (2005−2007)
Release date8 September 2009 (16 years ago)26 March 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.733 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.73 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)16 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size296 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °C67 °C
Number of transistors774 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X3450 1.63
+191%
Pentium Extreme Edition 965 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X3450 2881
+192%
Samples: 180
Pentium Extreme Edition 965 987
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.56
Recency 8 September 2009 26 March 2006
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon X3450 has a 191.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon X3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3450 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Extreme Edition 965 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3450
Xeon X3450
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965
Pentium Extreme Edition 965

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 342 votes

Rate Xeon X3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 19 votes

Rate Pentium Extreme Edition 965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X3450 and Pentium Extreme Edition 965, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.