Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Xeon X3440

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2020not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.74no data
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)11 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.53 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 11 October 2019
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600AF has an age advantage of 10 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 644 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 268 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.