Xeon E-2334 vs X3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.45
Xeon E-2334
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
+466%

Xeon E-2334 outperforms Xeon X3430 by a whopping 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2170918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.4411.94
Architecture codenameno dataRocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.45
Xeon E-2334 8.20
+466%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3430 2305
Xeon E-2334 13021
+465%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3430 378
Xeon E-2334 1620
+329%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3430 1074
Xeon E-2334 5158
+380%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 8.20
Recency 1 July 2009 8 September 2021
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2334 has a 465.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Xeon E-2334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
Intel Xeon E-2334
Xeon E-2334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 141 vote

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Xeon E-2334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or Xeon E-2334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.