Celeron N6211 vs Xeon X3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.48
+2.1%

Xeon X3430 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20742092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.363.44
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Architecture codenameno dataElkhart Lake
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)17 July 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54
Current price$49 $240 (4.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 856% better value for money than Xeon X3430.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
L2 cacheno data1.5 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.48
+2.1%
Celeron N6211 1.45

Xeon X3430 outperforms Celeron N6211 by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3430 2286
+1.8%
Celeron N6211 2245

Xeon X3430 outperforms Celeron N6211 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 1.45
Recency 1 July 2009 17 July 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211.

Be aware that Xeon X3430 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 135 votes

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.