Celeron G1610T vs Xeon X3430

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.45
+72.6%
Celeron G1610T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84

Xeon X3430 outperforms Celeron G1610T by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21702577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.442.27
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.45
+72.6%
Celeron G1610T 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3430 2305
+73.7%
Celeron G1610T 1327

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3430 378
+14.9%
Celeron G1610T 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3430 1074
+84.5%
Celeron G1610T 582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 0.84
Recency 1 July 2009 3 December 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X3430 has a 72.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G1610T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3430 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3430 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1610T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 141 vote

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.