A4-9120 vs Xeon X3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.45
+88.3%
A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77

Xeon X3430 outperforms A4-9120 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21842655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.444.86
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size296 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and A4-9120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and A4-9120.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.45
+88.3%
A4-9120 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3430 2305
+89.4%
A4-9120 1217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 0.77
Recency 8 September 2009 1 June 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon X3430 has a 88.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-9120, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3430 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3430 is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
AMD A4-9120
A4-9120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 502 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or A4-9120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.