Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs Xeon X3380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3380
2009
95 Watt
1.62
Ryzen Embedded V2516
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.19
+406%

Ryzen Embedded V2516 outperforms Xeon X3380 by a whopping 406% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2101928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency1.6177.51
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir (2020−2023)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed3.16 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.269 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics 384SP

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3380 1.62
Ryzen Embedded V2516 8.19
+406%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3380 2568
Ryzen Embedded V2516 13016
+407%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 8.19
Recency 1 January 2009 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V2516 has a 405.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V2516 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Ryzen Embedded V2516, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
Ryzen Embedded V2516

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2516 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or Ryzen Embedded V2516, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.