Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) vs Xeon X3380

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2083not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.61no data
Architecture codenameno dataAgena (2007−2008)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon X3380 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)
Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or Phenom X4 9950 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.