Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Xeon X3370
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2406 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.65 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 840M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3370 and Ryzen AI 5 435.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 5 January 2026 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 5 435 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon X3370 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 435. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3370 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 5 435 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
