Xeon E-2336 vs X3360

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3360
2008
95 Watt
1.52
Xeon E-2336
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.53
+593%

Xeon E-2336 outperforms Xeon X3360 by a whopping 593% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2133735
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.5115.33
Architecture codenameno dataRocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3360 1.52
Xeon E-2336 10.53
+593%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3360 2412
Xeon E-2336 16731
+594%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3360 417
Xeon E-2336 2048
+391%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3360 1328
Xeon E-2336 7454
+461%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 10.53
Recency 1 January 2008 8 September 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2336 has a 592.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2336 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3360 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3360 and Xeon E-2336, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3360
Xeon X3360
Intel Xeon E-2336
Xeon E-2336

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 46 votes

Rate Xeon X3360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 44 votes

Rate Xeon E-2336 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3360 or Xeon E-2336, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.