Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Xeon X3360

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3360
2008
95 Watt
1.52
+130%
Core 2 Duo E7400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66

Xeon X3360 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7400 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21462760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.510.96
Architecture codenameno dataWolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3360 1.52
+130%
Core 2 Duo E7400 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3360 2412
+132%
Core 2 Duo E7400 1041

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3360 417
+31.1%
Core 2 Duo E7400 318

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3360 1328
+159%
Core 2 Duo E7400 512

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 0.66
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon X3360 has a 130.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo E7400, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3360 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E7400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3360 and Core 2 Duo E7400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3360
Xeon X3360
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
Core 2 Duo E7400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 46 votes

Rate Xeon X3360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 339 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3360 or Core 2 Duo E7400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.