Apple M2 Max vs Xeon X3360

Place in the ranking	2133	385
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	no data	Apple M-Series
Power efficiency	1.51	20.10
Release date	1 January 2008 (16 years ago)	17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	no data	12
Base clock speed	2.83 GHz	2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	no data	3.3 MB
L2 cache	no data	36 MB
L3 cache	12 MB L2 Cache	48 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	5 nm
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	67000 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	LGA775	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3360 1.52

Apple M2 Max 16.78
+1004%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3360 2412

Apple M2 Max 26656
+1005%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.52	16.78
Recency	1 January 2008	17 January 2023
Chip lithography	45 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	79 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 1003.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 20.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3360 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3360 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.