Opteron X2170 vs Xeon X3330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3330
2008
95 Watt
1.33
+10.8%
Opteron X2170
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20

Xeon X3330 outperforms Opteron X2170 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22612349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.324.52
Architecture codenameno dataSteppe Eagle (2016)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-13625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FT3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R5E

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3330 1.33
+10.8%
Opteron X2170 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3330 2111
+10.5%
Opteron X2170 1911

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 1.20
Recency 1 July 2008 1 September 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon X3330 has a 10.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Opteron X2170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron X2170 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3330 and Opteron X2170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3330
Xeon X3330
AMD Opteron X2170
Opteron X2170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 26 votes

Rate Xeon X3330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3330 or Opteron X2170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.