Xeon Gold 5320 vs X3320

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon X3320
2008
1.28

Gold 5320 outperforms X3320 by a whopping 1797% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2168182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2320.40
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$35 $2078

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5320 has 8770% better value for money than Xeon X3320.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data26 (Hexacosa-Core)
Threadsno data52
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache39 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3320 1.28
Xeon Gold 5320 24.28
+1797%

Gold 5320 outperforms X3320 by 1797% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3320 1986
Xeon Gold 5320 37558
+1791%

Gold 5320 outperforms X3320 by 1791% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 24.28
Recency 1 January 2008 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 185 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3320 and Xeon Gold 5320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320
Intel Xeon Gold 5320
Xeon Gold 5320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3320 or Xeon Gold 5320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.