Pentium Dual T4200 vs Xeon X3230
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3230 outperforms Pentium Dual T4200 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[_id] => 2263
[filename] => Opteron-X2170
[title] => AMD Opteron X2170
[manufacturer] => AMD
[result] => 1.24
[_number] => 2279
[cores] => 4
[custom_id] =>
)
)
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2216 | 2623 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium Dual Core |
| Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| AMT | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 0.74 |
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 1 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon X3230 has a 79.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Pentium Dual T4200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X3230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T4200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T4200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Pentium Dual Core T4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
