Athlon II X2 265 vs Xeon X3230

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3230
2007
95 Watt
1.29
+61.3%
Athlon II X2 265
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.80

Xeon X3230 outperforms Athlon II X2 265 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22722605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.64
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.291.16
Architecture codenameno dataRegor (2009−2013)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3230 1.29
+61.3%
Athlon II X2 265 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3230 2052
+62%
Athlon II X2 265 1267

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.80
Recency 1 July 2007 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon X3230 has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II X2 265, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 265 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X2 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Athlon II X2 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3230
Xeon X3230
AMD Athlon II X2 265
Athlon II X2 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 25 votes

Rate Xeon X3230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3230 or Athlon II X2 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.