Xeon X5687 vs W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3680
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.41
+32%
Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.34

Xeon W3680 outperforms Xeon X5687 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13311567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.133.39
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.212.43
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350$121

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5687 has 59% better value for money than Xeon W3680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.86 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C80 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bit40 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB288 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3680 4.41
+32%
Xeon X5687 3.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3680 7003
+31.9%
Xeon X5687 5309

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 3.34
Recency 16 March 2010 14 February 2011
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8

Xeon W3680 has a 32% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon X5687, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The Xeon W3680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5687 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Xeon X5687, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 142 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or Xeon X5687, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.