EPYC Embedded 3251 vs Xeon W3680
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1613 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.70 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 1.30 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (16 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $315 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC Embedded 3251.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3251 has an age advantage of 7 years, 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads, a 129% more advanced lithography process, and 136% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W3680 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3251. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
