EPYC 9535 vs Xeon W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.16no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.22no data
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350$8,992

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12128
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size239 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 12 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon W3680 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and EPYC 9535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
AMD EPYC 9535
EPYC 9535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 142 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or EPYC 9535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.