i5-14400F vs Xeon W3680

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3680
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.41
Core i5-14400F
2024
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.29
+269%

Core i5-14400F outperforms Xeon W3680 by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1342408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.2760.55
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.1923.59
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-14400F has 2567% better value for money than Xeon W3680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size239 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB192 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3680 4.41
i5-14400F 16.29
+269%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3680 7003
i5-14400F 25872
+269%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W3680 545
i5-14400F 2343
+330%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W3680 2498
i5-14400F 11435
+358%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 16.29
Recency 16 March 2010 8 January 2024
Physical cores 6 10
Threads 12 16
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i5-14400F has a 269.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-14400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Core i5-14400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
Intel Core i5-14400F
Core i5-14400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 144 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 608 votes

Rate Core i5-14400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or Core i5-14400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.