Core i5-1235U vs Xeon W3680
Aggregate performance score
i5-1235U outperforms Xeon W3680 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1255 | 830 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 8 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.47 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-M |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.333 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 928 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 9.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-1235U outperforms Xeon W3680 by 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-1235U outperforms Xeon W3680 by 91% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-1235U outperforms Xeon W3680 by 234% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-1235U outperforms Xeon W3680 by 125% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.53 | 8.67 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-1235U has a 91.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 66.7% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-1235U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3680 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-1235U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Core i5-1235U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
