A10-7890K vs Xeon W3680
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W3680 outperforms A10-7890K by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1249 | 1731 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.43 | 0.17 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Godaveri (2014−2018) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 11 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $150 |
| Current price | $213 (0.6x MSRP) | $342 (2.3x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W3680 has 1329% better value for money than A10-7890K.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | FM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | 1 |
| FMA | no data | FMA4 |
| AVX | no data | AVX |
| FRTC | no data | 1 |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| PowerTune | no data | + |
| DualGraphics | no data | 1 |
| TrueAudio | no data | + |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
| PowerGating | no data | + |
| Out-of-band client management | no data | + |
| VirusProtect | no data | + |
| RAID | no data | - |
| HSA | no data | 1 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Number of pipelines | no data | 512 |
| Enduro | no data | + |
| Switchable graphics | no data | 1 |
| UVD | no data | + |
| VCE | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W3680 outperforms A10-7890K by 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W3680 outperforms A10-7890K by 99% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.53 | 2.28 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 11 January 2016 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Cost | $350 | $150 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Xeon W3680 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-7890K in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while A10-7890K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and A10-7890K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
