AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Xeon W3670

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Xeon W3670
4.18

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W3670 by 1802% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12754
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.6111.94
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Genoa
Release date29 August 2010 (13 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$295$11,805
Current price$678 (2.3x MSRP)$3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 1857% better value for money than Xeon W3670.

Technical specs

Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size239 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size24 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3670 4.18
EPYC 9654 79.49
+1802%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W3670 by 1802% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3670 6426
EPYC 9654 122091
+1800%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W3670 by 1800% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3670 516
EPYC 9654 1884
+265%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W3670 by 265% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3670 2333
EPYC 9654 19322
+728%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W3670 by 728% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.18 79.49
Recency 29 August 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Cost $295 $11805
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3670 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3670
Xeon W3670
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 41 vote

Rate Intel Xeon W3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3670 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.