Xeon X3230 vs W3565

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3565
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.12
+64.3%

Xeon W3565 outperforms Xeon X3230 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18742285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.541.28
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)no data
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data60 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3565 2.12
+64.3%
Xeon X3230 1.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3565 3371
+64.3%
Xeon X3230 2052

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 1.29
Recency 1 November 2009 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon W3565 has a 64.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3230, on the other hand, has 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W3565 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3565 and Xeon X3230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3565
Xeon W3565
Intel Xeon X3230
Xeon X3230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate Xeon W3565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 25 votes

Rate Xeon X3230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3565 or Xeon X3230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.