Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Xeon W3540

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1932not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.42no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads828
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 29 July 2017
Physical cores 4 14
Threads 8 28
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon W3540 has 38.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3540 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3540
Xeon W3540
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon W3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3540 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.