Xeon L5630 vs W3520

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
1.90
Xeon L5630
2010
4 cores / 8 threads
1.95
+2.6%

L5630 outperforms W3520 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18511826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.110.50
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release dateMarch 2009 (15 years old)16 March 2010 (14 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$1,100
Current price$168 (0.4x MSRP)$153 (0.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3520 has 522% better value for money than Xeon L5630.

Technical specs

Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C63 °C
Number of transistors731 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bit40 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB288 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.90
Xeon L5630 1.95
+2.6%

L5630 outperforms W3520 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3520 2937
Xeon L5630 3018
+2.8%

L5630 outperforms W3520 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.90 1.95
Cost $404 $1100
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 40 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon L5630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon L5630
Xeon L5630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 97 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 52 votes

Rate Xeon L5630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Xeon L5630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.