FX-8370E vs Xeon W3520
Aggregate performance score
FX-8370E outperforms Xeon W3520 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2240 | 1797 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | 0.70 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.54 | 1.35 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (16 years ago) | 2 September 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $404 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
FX-8370E has 600% better value for money than Xeon W3520.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and FX-8370E.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | n/a |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.67 | 3.04 |
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 2 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
FX-8370E has a 82% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.
The AMD FX-8370E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W3520 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3520 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8370E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
