Xeon Gold 6414U vs W-3375

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads
38.19
+3.3%
Xeon Gold 6414U
2023
32 cores / 64 threads
36.98

W-3375 outperforms Gold 6414U by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Sapphire Rapids
Release date29 July 2021 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed Specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3832 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads7664
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3375 38.19
+3.3%
Xeon Gold 6414U 36.98

W-3375 outperforms Gold 6414U by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3375 59069
+3.3%
Xeon Gold 6414U 57200

W-3375 outperforms Gold 6414U by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 38.19 36.98
Recency 29 July 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 38 32
Threads 76 64
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 250 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6414U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Xeon Gold 6414U
Xeon Gold 6414U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6414U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Xeon Gold 6414U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.