Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Xeon W-3375
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3375 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R2314 by a whopping 895% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 135 | 1731 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 13.30 | 24.07 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-W (2021) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 29 July 2021 (4 years ago) | 21 June 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 38 | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 76 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 57 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 83 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,940 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA4189 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen Embedded R2314.
| PCIe version | 4 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.52 | 3.37 |
| Recency | 29 July 2021 | 21 June 2022 |
| Physical cores | 38 | 4 |
| Threads | 76 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon W-3375 has a 894.7% higher aggregate performance score, 850% more physical cores and 1800% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Embedded R2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 1700% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R2314 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
