Ryzen 3 5425U vs Xeon W-3365

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
37.17
+419%
Ryzen 3 5425U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.16

Xeon W-3365 outperforms Ryzen 3 5425U by a whopping 419% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking87998
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency13.0345.17
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache48 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4189FP6
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U.

PCIe version43.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3365 37.17
+419%
Ryzen 3 5425U 7.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3365 59038
+419%
Ryzen 3 5425U 11367

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.17 7.16
Recency 29 July 2021 6 January 2022
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W-3365 has a 419.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 3 5425U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5425U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3365 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5425U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3365 and Ryzen 3 5425U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
Ryzen 3 5425U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 228 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5425U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3365 or Ryzen 3 5425U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.