EPYC 7773X vs Xeon W-3345

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3345
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
28.77
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+100%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon W-3345 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.8919.47
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Milan-X (2022)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP3
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version44.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3345 28.77
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+100%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3345 45694
EPYC 7773X 91491
+100%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3345 1460
EPYC 7773X 1531
+4.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3345 13695
EPYC 7773X 15277
+11.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.77 57.60
Recency 29 July 2021 22 March 2022
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon W-3345 has 12% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 100.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3345 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3345 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3345 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.