Xeon w9-3475X vs W-3335

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
Xeon w9-3475X
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt
40.76
+64.8%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Xeon W-3335 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.11
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.3712.86
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,739

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)36
Threads3272
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)82.5 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °C74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX--
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes64112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 24.74
Xeon w9-3475X 40.76
+64.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
Xeon w9-3475X 64752
+64.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.74 40.76
Recency 29 July 2021 15 February 2023
Physical cores 16 36
Threads 32 72
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon W-3335 has 20% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3475X, on the other hand, has a 64.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3475X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or Xeon w9-3475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.