Xeon W-3375 vs W-3335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
25.73
Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
38.68
+50.3%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon W-3335 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.3713.04
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)38
Threads3276
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version44
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 25.73
Xeon W-3375 38.68
+50.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
Xeon W-3375 59069
+50.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.73 38.68
Physical cores 16 38
Threads 32 76
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon W-3335 has 8% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3375, on the other hand, has a 50.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 137.5% more physical cores and 137.5% more threads.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.