Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon W-3335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
+71.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.43

Xeon W-3335 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency9.3748.77
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s54 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache24 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FP8
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version4no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 24.74
+71.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
+71.4%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22919

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.74 14.43
Recency 29 July 2021 1 October 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon W-3335 has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 792.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3335 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.