EPYC 9575F vs Xeon W-3323

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking403not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.01no data
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Turin (2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2021 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon W-3323 has 81.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3323 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3323 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.