EPYC 4564P vs Xeon W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.75
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
40.12
+55.8%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Xeon W-3275M by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.97no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6428

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.75
EPYC 4564P 40.12
+55.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39834
EPYC 4564P 62058
+55.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.75 40.12
Recency 3 June 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 55.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 20.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.