Xeon Gold 6336Y vs W-3275

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.77
Xeon Gold 6336Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
28.65
+11.2%

Xeon Gold 6336Y outperforms Xeon W-3275 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.16no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.8914.65
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5648
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 25.77
Xeon Gold 6336Y 28.65
+11.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 40931
Xeon Gold 6336Y 45517
+11.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.77 28.65
Recency 3 June 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6336Y, on the other hand, has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 10.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Xeon Gold 6336Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y
Xeon Gold 6336Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6336Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Xeon Gold 6336Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.