Xeon 6740E vs W-3275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
23.48
Xeon 6740E
2024
96 cores / 96 threads, 250 Watt
43.34
+84.6%

Xeon 6740E outperforms Xeon W-3275 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.976.66
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency4.847.33
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449$5,265

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6740E has 124% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)96
Threads5696
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache38.5 MB96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3275 23.48
Xeon 6740E 43.34
+84.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 41267
Samples: 9
Xeon 6740E 76167
+84.6%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.48 43.34
Recency 3 June 2019 3 June 2024
Physical cores 28 96
Threads 56 96
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has 22% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6740E, on the other hand, has a 84.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 242.9% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6740E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon 6740E
Xeon 6740E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6740E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3275 and Xeon 6740E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.