EPYC 7542 vs Xeon W-3275

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads
26.87

EPYC 7542 outperforms Xeon W-3275 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking156117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.0311.49
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449$3,400
Current price$5391 (1.2x MSRP)$2197 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7542 has 63% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.87
EPYC 7542 30.79
+14.6%

EPYC 7542 outperforms Xeon W-3275 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275 41554
EPYC 7542 47626
+14.6%

EPYC 7542 outperforms Xeon W-3275 by 15% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.87 30.79
Recency 3 June 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64
Cost $4449 $3400
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7542 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7542, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
AMD EPYC 7542
EPYC 7542

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate EPYC 7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or EPYC 7542, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.