EPYC 7413 vs Xeon W-3275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.54
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
32.57
+22.7%

EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon W-3275 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking181125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.0814.78
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7413 has 5% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5648
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2526.5
L1 cache1.75 MB1536 KB
L2 cache28 MB12 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.54
EPYC 7413 32.57
+22.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 40931
EPYC 7413 50223
+22.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.54 32.57
Recency 3 June 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 13.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.