i9-13900KF vs Xeon W-3275

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.77
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.67
+42.3%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon W-3275 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19593
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.1664.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Core i9
Power efficiency11.8913.71
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KF has 479% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2530
L1 cache1.75 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 25.77
i9-13900KF 36.67
+42.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 40931
i9-13900KF 58254
+42.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.77 36.67
Recency 3 June 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 32
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has 16.7% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 42.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 64% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 642 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.