Intel Xeon Gold 6312U vs W-3265M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon W-3265M
20.85

Gold 6312U outperforms W-3265M by 32% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking228144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.30no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data
Current price$8396 (1.3x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 20.85
Xeon Gold 6312U 27.43
+31.6%

Gold 6312U outperforms W-3265M by 32% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3265M 32025
Xeon Gold 6312U 42124
+31.5%

Gold 6312U outperforms W-3265M by 32% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.85 27.43
Recency 3 June 2019 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 185 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6312U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.